We Would Prefer to Stand Aback of Disagreeable Incriminations of "Smoking Weed"

Santa Cruz, CA- As we might say we would prefer to stand aback of disagreeable incriminations of "smoking weed" trying to lead the state of California to marijuana legalization in Santa Cruz.

Tom Ammiano, State Assemblyman, D-San Francisco draws his attention to the fact that growing, buying, selling and possession of cannabis are considered to be illegal and forbidden under federal law, but he has presented a bill according to which the same as with alcohol people over 21 will be able to carry all these activities. He also tried that was not affected by state legalization, which also y all these activities unlikely for the present. He has announced another evident fact that by means of pot legalization California's state coffers get excellent chance to enrich their arrearages for more then a billion dollars a year with the help of taxes and other fees.

You may see a couple of points to think about in favor of legalizing weed:

To put marijuana under control means that it will be easier to regulate all the processes, because almost no one is able to say definitely whether or not their children have easy access to marijuana or let it to say alcohol?

Worth while saying that marijuana legalizing is a good chance to dismiss criminal element associated with smuggling and selling pot at all and there will be no need to spend huge amounts of money on costly anti-drug programs.

The overspread use of easily available pot - hello, Michael Phelps - has given preferential treatment to a despisal for laws people don't agree with. I believe that least of all our society wants to wallow in pinheaded stupidity and obliviousness.

One more provement is that In Santa Cruz, where the problem of marijuana legalization paled into insignificance at pleasure voters and where proportionment of medical marijuana continues despite countermeasure from the federal government, the world has not ended, nor has public safety visibly been endangered.

On the other hand the arguments against legalizing marijuana also are persuasive.

Have you ever asked yourself to what degree is marijuana as dangerous in comparison with alcohol? Still according to statistics about anti-social behavior, auto accidents and the domestic violence, the evident answer is "no."

While pro-pot protagonists always point that marijuana is not addictive, most of us can remember people who have pretty much time trying to cure a disease. There is no a secret that their addiction heavily influences personal behavior and character and later-on leads to large-scale ranging personal problems that end up having a huge cost to society.

I do not believe it would become the stone of stumbling to the federal government. The feds have so far refused to acknowledge local decisions relating to medical pot legalization, so why would they approve recreational use of the drug? Even president Barack Obama, who has admitted drug use in his youthful past, has stated he is not in favor of legalization. So, the problem is worth the whistle.